New article shows how 18th century law helps us understand the Constitution
- July 10, 2018
CONSTITUTION – ObamaCare
- Home
- CONSTITUTION – ObamaCare
Rob Natelson and Jon Caldara explore the latest court ruling on Obamacare0
- January 14, 2019
The ruling that the mandate was unconstitutional was certainly correct. Whether than means the rest of the law fails is less certain.
READ MORE
In defense of the court decision striking down Obamacare0
- December 24, 2018
The truth is that the quiet death of the ACA would surely be less disruptive than its chaotic life.
READ MORE
It’s time to truly test the constitutionality of Obamacare0
- December 3, 2018
Previous Origination Clause plaintiffs lost because they attacked Obamacare’s taxes instead of its regulations. Plaintiffs suing for relief from regulations that harm them may have more success.
READ MORE
New article shows how 18th century law helps us understand the Constitution0
- July 10, 2018
“Living Constitutionalists” sometimes claim erroneously that recovering the Constitution’s original meaning is impractical.
READ MOREAbolish the Filibuster? Maybe We Should0
- July 10, 2016
Should freedom advocates support the U.S. Senate’s “filibuster” rule? The traditional answer has been “yes.” But we might want to take another look. The Senate’s filibuster system allows individual Senators to block legislative action by making long speeches (i.e., “filibuster”) on the floor. When several Senators take turns speaking, they can block legislative action indefinitely.
READ MOREThe Most Radical Decision Ever?0
- June 29, 2015
This article first appeared in The American Thinker. A complete commentary on the same sex marriage case would take far more than a single short article. Accordingly, I offer only some discrete thoughts: * A big expansion of federal power. Many libertarians believe the courts should use the Fourteenth Amendment to protect rights unenumerated in
READ MORE
