NPV . . . with or without congressional approval . . . violates a central principle of constitutional law.
READ MOREThe delegates . . . found the question of how to choose the federal executive one of the most perplexing they faced. People who want to abolish the Electoral College usually are unfamiliar with how perplexing the issue was—and still is.
READ MOREComments from [the ratification] debates generally show that the ratifiers understood presidential electors were to exercise their own judgment when voting.
READ MOREThe two leading precedents in the English speaking world both reinforced dictionary definitions: Electors were to think for themselves.
READ MOREIf we were to cut the presidency down to constitutional size, it wouldn’t matter so much that on rare occasions the position’s occupant was not the popular vote winner.
READ MOREIt is not true, as some claim, that the Founders acted only out of distrust of democracy. Rather, the system was a brilliant response to a complicated set of issues.
READ MOREThe Electoral College is not part of the U.S. government, nor are the electors government officials.
READ MOREConstitutional scholar and author Rob Natelson sits down with guest host Mike Krause to discuss the national popular vote scheme being cooked up in Colorado.
READ MOREPanama’s May 5 presidential election illustrates how NPV awards victory to a candidate most voters don’t want.
READ MOREGive our votes to New York and California? No way!
READ MOREDuring the founding era, election rules were said to fix the “manner of election” . . . This term embraced . . . five categories.
READ MORERead John Samples policy paper on the reasons states should not join the National Popular Vote compact.
READ MORE