Commerce Clause

New Video on the Limits of Congress’s Commerce Clause Power 0
- March 6, 2023
Congress’ effort to regulate Indian child placement is unconstitutional.
READ MORE
New Study Finds Administrative State Unconstitutional 0
- December 26, 2022
When the framers and ratifiers used the phrase “regulate Commerce” they meant “regulate trade.” Both “regulate commerce” and “regulate trade” meant to administer the body of jurisprudence known as the law merchant.
READ MORE
The real Commerce Clause—as the Founders knew it 0
- December 16, 2022
During the Founding era, the phrase “regulate Commerce” had a very specific meaning
READ MORE

Will the Supreme Court stretch the Commerce Clause even more?0
- September 7, 2022
Some claim that when the word “Commerce” is applied to Native Americans, it magically balloons in scope, allowing Congress to regulate just about anything.
READ MORE
A Further Response to Prof. Ablavsky on the Indian Commerce Clause 0
- August 29, 2022
We discovered that Ablavsky’s work contained a disturbing number of inaccurate, non-existent, and misleading citations, as well as deceptively-edited quotations.
READ MORE
A Preliminary Response to Prof. Ablavsky’s “Indian Commerce Clause” Attack 0
- April 7, 2022
An advocate of vast congressional power takes quotes out of context, misrepresents what others say, and makes historical errors
READ MORE

Contribute