May state legislative applications limit an Article V convention? Subject, yes; specific language, probably not
- September 12, 2013
A new study confirms this blog’s conclusions in all important details.
READ MOREMorris’ approach was unique and has served as an inspiration for constitution-makers ever since.
READ MOREFortunately, by the time the Constitution was written, this verbal confusion had been pretty much been sorted out.
READ MORERob’s research, published in the 2008 article, showed convincingly that Justice Thomas was right to be skeptical.
READ MOREComments from [the ratification] debates generally show that the ratifiers understood presidential electors were to exercise their own judgment when voting.
READ MOREThe two leading precedents in the English speaking world both reinforced dictionary definitions: Electors were to think for themselves.
READ MORE