ObamaCare lawsuit

Life after Supreme Court Health Care Ruling 0
- June 25, 2012
The New York Times asks: “What would the future hold if the Supreme Court strikes down the most controversial part of the health care law, the individual mandate?” The Times published responses from two free-market health care advocates: Michael Cannon (Cato) & Grace-Marie Turner (Galen). Continue reading →
READ MORE
The dubious policy assumptions behind ObamaCare’s legal defense 0
- June 18, 2012
ObamaCare’s legal defense relies as much on policy arguments—about the nature of uncompensated medical care, the role of Medicaid, and the interaction of the law’s various provisions—as it does on constitutional reasoning. But the policy case is just as dubious as the constitutional one. Continue reading →
READ MORE
Three ‘What-if’ Scenarios for Obamacare & the Supreme Court 0
- June 6, 2012
While the Supreme Court’s decision is likely a month away … Congress, state governments, and businesses across the country are puzzling over “what if” alternatives to try to be ready when the decision is issued. Here are the three most likely options: Continue reading →
READ MORE

Three ‘What-if’ Scenarios for Obamacare & the Supreme Court 0
- June 6, 2012
While the Supreme Court’s decision is likely a month away … Congress, state governments, and businesses across the country are puzzling over “what if” alternatives to try to be ready when the decision is issued. Here are the three most likely options: Continue reading →
READ MORE
What to do if Supreme Court overturns ObamaCare 0
- April 12, 2012
Economist John Cochrane suggests free-market health care reforms that Congress should enact if the Supreme Court strikes down ObamaCare Continue reading →
READ MORE
Memo to Justice Kagan: Taxes Are Coercive 0
- April 4, 2012
Apparently Justice Elena Kagan is oblivious to the obvious fact that taxes are coercive, in that they forcibly take wealth away from the owners of that wealth and give it to others. Continue reading →
READ MORE

Contribute