Major Problems in Montana's CI-128 (the Abortion Initiative)
- September 26, 2024
Was Marshall really a model for liberal activist justices? Learn the truth in this audio series.
READ MOREThere has been a effort in the law schools—and at times in the Supreme Court—to appropriate Marshall as a model for liberal activism.
READ MORENothing in the Constitution gives [the Speaker of the House a presidential-style veto.
READ MOREEvery so often I’m asked whether the Founders anticipated judicial review. In other words, whether the Founders expected the courts to void laws they found unconstitutional. The clear answer is “yes.” During the colonial era, each colony was governed by its charter, which was a kind of constitution for the colony. Colonial laws in violation
READ MOREOne of the most enduring myths in American constitutional history is that Chief Justice John Marshall was a judicial activist whose decisions are good precedent for the modern federal monster state. Marshall was the fourth chief justice of the U.S. Supreme Court (third, if you don’t count John Rutledge, a recess appointment who was never
READ MORE