Quantcast
728 x 90
728 x 90
728 x 90
728 x 90
728 x 90



  • Two Overreaching GOP House Bills Show Why We Need a Convention of States0

    • May 17, 2015

    Two bills introduced in the U.S. House of Representatives show that whatever they may say on the campaign trail, many Republicans in Congress don’t have much more respect for federalism, states’ rights, or local control than Democrats do. These two bills also demonstrate, if further demonstration be needed, that Congress has broken almost all constitutional

    READ MORE
  • Conservatives need to support trial by jury, too0

    • June 18, 2014

    Although I’ve often criticized the constitutional tone-deafness of “progressives,” conservatives can sometimes exhibit such tendencies as well. Over at The Seventh Amendment Advocate, Andy Cochran points out why trial by jury in civil cases—as guaranteed by the Seventh Amendment—is important, and how some conservatives disregard it. The problem arises because when constituency politics often trumps

    READ MORE
  • Supreme Court’s Obamacare Decision Renders Federal “Tort-Reform” Bill Unconstitutional0

    • October 18, 2013

    Just to show you that hypocrisy is alive and well in Washington, D.C. (as if you didn’t know), Title V of the Republican bill to “repeal and replace Obamacare” contains some of the same constitutional problems that led 27 states to challenge Obamacare. Under Title V, Congress would partially assume command of  state jury trials

    READ MORE
  • Did the Founders’ Constitution Permit Federal Tort Reform?0

    • November 23, 2012

    NOTE: The photo shows the author at the sundial in James Madison’s garden at Montpelier, VA. On behalf of the national Chamber of Commerce, super-lawyer Paul Clement has authored a new paper arguing that federal tort reform is constitutional. The paper begins with a section purporting to show that the Framers’ Commerce Clause was broad

    READ MORE
  • Obamacare Decision Suggests U.S. Malpractice Bill Unconstitutional0

    • July 27, 2012

    Little-noticed amid the commentary on the Supreme Court’s health care decision is the decision’s blow to congressional efforts to federalize medical malpractice law—a potential element of the Republican plan to “replace Obamacare.” Medical malpractice cases, like most areas of civil justice, traditionally are judged by state courts under state law rather than by the national

    READ MORE
  • House Rules Committee: “Violate Your Oath No Matter How You Vote!”0

    • March 15, 2012

    It’s a stunning betrayal of all those hardworking, pro-Constitution Americans who gave U.S. House Republicans their majority. Republicans controlling the House Rules Committee have added sweeping new mandates on the states to a bill repealing part of Obamacare. The result is revised H.R. 5. Just on good government grounds, those two very different items do

    READ MORE