Senator Kaine’s Astonishing Ignorance
Why wasn’t Senator Kaine’s astonishing ignorance exposed long ago?
Three More U.S. Appeals Courts Rely on Research by II’s Rob Natelson
Like the research of II’s Dave Kopel, Rob Natelson’s publications are percolating into federal appeals court opinions.
Why the Supreme Court Should Overrule the Same-Sex Marriage Decision
Shortly after the ruling, I wrote that Obergefell might be the Supreme Court’s “most radical decision ever.” A decade later, that assessment seems correct.
Virgil and the Constitution
Participants in the debates over the ratification of the Constitution freely quoted Virgil to drive home their arguments.
“Ask Rob Natelson” to Air Monthly on KLZ-560 Denver Radio
The segment will air again on August 14, and after that on the second Tuesday of each month.
Unpacking the Supreme Court’s ‘Universal Injunction’ Decision
The court found that the statute granting courts power to grant injunctions did not include universal injunctions.
Understanding the Supreme Court’s Case on Transgender Treatment for Children
Skrmetti was one of several cases this year in which the court’s decision protected children.
Implied Powers in the Constitution
The Founding-era doctrine of implied powers has been misunderstood during the modern era. Result have been an over-estimate of congressional power and confusion about the President’s authority.
Justice Clarence Thomas’s Wise Words About ‘Experts’
Experts and professional associations always have been influenced by economic considerations. Today, few are immune from political pressure as well.
“The Original Constitution”—Long-Awaited 4th Edition Arrives!
The latest edition responds to new controversies surrounding an old document.
The Supreme Court’s Unanimous Religious Freedom Ruling Explained
The media claim that there is a firm 6-3 Supreme Court is untrue, as demonstrated by this freedom of religion case.
SCOTUS Nixes Discrimination Against Heterosexuals and White Males
The Supreme Court ruled against requiring members of “majority groups” to bear a higher burden to prove illegal discrimination.
