“Ask Rob Natelson” to Air Monthly on KLZ-560 Denver Radio

The segment will air again on August 14, and after that on the second Tuesday of each month.
Unpacking the Supreme Court’s ‘Universal Injunction’ Decision

The court found that the statute granting courts power to grant injunctions did not include universal injunctions.
Understanding the Supreme Court’s Case on Transgender Treatment for Children

Skrmetti was one of several cases this year in which the court’s decision protected children.
Implied Powers in the Constitution

The Founding-era doctrine of implied powers has been misunderstood during the modern era. Result have been an over-estimate of congressional power and confusion about the President’s authority.
Justice Clarence Thomas’s Wise Words About ‘Experts’

Experts and professional associations always have been influenced by economic considerations. Today, few are immune from political pressure as well.
“The Original Constitution”—Long-Awaited 4th Edition Arrives!

The latest edition responds to new controversies surrounding an old document.
The Supreme Court’s Unanimous Religious Freedom Ruling Explained

The media claim that there is a firm 6-3 Supreme Court is untrue, as demonstrated by this freedom of religion case.
SCOTUS Nixes Discrimination Against Heterosexuals and White Males

The Supreme Court ruled against requiring members of “majority groups” to bear a higher burden to prove illegal discrimination.
Are President Trump’s Tariff Orders Constitutional?

The fundamental problem with the President’s tariff orders is not that he interpreted the law too expansively. It is that the law may be unconstitutional.
The Supreme Court’s ‘Ghost Gun’ Case: Judicial Amendment by ‘Interpretation’

Courts and commentators sometimes try to change a law by adopting unusual methods of intepretation
Will the Supreme Court Restore Popular Control Over the ‘Deep State?’

The case of Trump v. Wilcox may be the next step in restoring democratic control over the federal bureaucracy.
Harvard Had It Coming

Identify a prominent piece of constitutional nonsense invented to promote unlimited federal power, and you can usually find Harvard people behind it.