Amy Stephens

Stopping Obamacare: 10 Reasons to Oppose the “Exchanges”0
- July 24, 2012
As listed by the Citizens Council for Health Freedom Continue reading →
READ MORE
States Can Still Kill Obamacare. But not Colorado. Thanks Amy Stephens.0
- July 13, 2012
States don’t need to wait until Election Day to take aim at a point of vulnerability that remains in place despite the Courts latest caprice. They can refuse to implement the laws insurance exchanges. Continue reading →
READ MORE
Contra Rep. Amy Stephens, States should reject ObamaCare insurance exchanges 0
- June 11, 2012
While Colorado Rep. Amy Stephens continues to support the government controlled health insurance exchange she established with SB-200, Michael Cannon at Cato explains why this is a bad idea: Continue reading →
READ MORE

Colo. Senate passes SB 11-200, would create politically-controlled health insurance exchange 0
- April 29, 2011
On April 27 the Colorado state Senate passed SB 11-200, which could establish a government-controlled health insurance exchange. Read up on why this is a bad idea.
READ MORE
SB 11-200: Colo. Insurance Exchange weakens repeal efforts, feds will control it 0
- April 22, 2011
A state-run insurance exchange in CO cannot defend itself from burdensome federal regulations. Collaboration w/ ObamaCare “confuses the commitment to repeal.” You “do not want …Obama campaigning on Obamacare’s faux flexibility and responsiveness — as would have been demonstrated by bipartisan state legislation to implement it.”
READ MORE
Politically-controlled Colorado health benefits exchange bill reaches Senate 0
- April 20, 2011
Colorado Senate Bill 11-200 advances to the state Senate without the provision that “would nullify the bill unless the state is allowed to opt out of the federal Affordable Care Act,” reports the Denver Business Journal
READ MORE

Contribute