The deeper significance of Justice Thomas’s 2nd amendment opinion
Justice Thomas’s opinion affirms that the scope of the right to keep and bear arms is fixed by the words of the amendment. The law is reflected in those words, not in some judge’s idea of what is important.
SCOTUS should uphold the right of religious people to refuse to serve the LGBT agenda
The state and would-be “customers” interfering with [a religious] business model have no more constitutional standing than a thug who disrupts a church service or shouts down a speaker.
1937-1944: How the Supreme Court Re-wrote the Constitution – the Complete Series
This series explains THE central event in the conversion of a constitutional federal government into the present unlimited “monster state.”
Biden’s pool of potential SCOTUS nominees hurts diversity rather than promotes It
If Biden truly cared about judicial diversity, instead of ruling out males and non-blacks, he’d rule out Harvard and Yale.
Understanding the Constitution: Income taxes, other taxes & the 16th Amendment
Congress could impose income taxes before the 16th amendment.
Amnesty International Brief Against Right To Bear Arms
Originally published on Reason.com As the U.S. Supreme Court considers whether to enforce the Second Amendment right to “bear arms” in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen, an amicus brief from Amnesty International argues that doing so would violate international law. In this post, I’ll examine the arguments in the AI brief. Back in […]
Twitter v. Trump, Part 3: Trump’s best ‘free speech’ claim against Twitter
If the plaintiffs actually do uncover systematic efforts by the Biden administration and other Democratic officeholders to suppress freedom of speech and freedom of the press, this will be the most egregious abuse-of-power scandal in recent times.
How the media misrepresent our liberal-leaning Supreme Court
The cases show that the Roberts court is committed to the case precedents through which the liberal 20th century justices re-wrote the Constitution.
The liberal Supreme Court: A review of the recent term
The court doesn’t have a “conservative majority.” In constitutional cases at least, it leans toward the liberal side.
The Supreme Court’s wretched Obamacare decision
Can there any clearer demonstration of why we need a convention of the states to take back our government?
Even with Amy Coney Barrett, we don’t really have a conservative Supreme Court
At the close of every annual court term, commentators express surprise that so many of the court’s decisions over the previous year have been liberal. They never make the simple deduction that if the court is producing so many liberal decisions, then perhaps it is not “conservative” after all.
Is the Nomination of Amy Coney Barrett Unconstitutional?
[T]he statements by Biden, Leahy, and Feingold are flatly incorrect. The current proceedings are neither “unconstitutional” nor “illegitimate” nor an attempt to “steal” anything.
