May state legislative applications limit an Article V convention? Subject, yes; specific language, probably not
- September 12, 2013
We have everything to gain from a convention of states and nothing to lose. . . We have a moral and legal obligation to employ that constitutional tool before splitting up the country.
READ MOREThese objections are not real. They are excuses made by lazy and cowardly people avoiding their civic responsibility.
READ MOREThere is no Supreme Court authority higher than [Chief Justice] Marshall, and he himself told us that “health laws of every description” are matters for determination by the states.
READ MOREThe Supreme Court finally declined to privilege a pro-abortion litigant. Instead, it applied the sort of common-sense standard it would apply to any other legal dispute.
READ MOREThe 25th amendment is seriously ambiguous. It creates uncertainties that discourage using its procedure.
READ MOREOur greatest chief justice was clear: Health regulations are for the states alone.
READ MORE