The Highly Political and Misunderstood Case of Moore v. Harper
Chief Justice Roberts’s language may create confusion the next time a state has a contested presidential election.
Your Guide to This Year’s Constitutional Cases From SCOTUS, Part II
The current bench challenges administrative overreach, but not overreach by Congress.
Your Guide to This Year’s Constitutional Cases From SCOTUS — Part I
The Supreme Court issued both liberal and constitutionalist decisions.
The “Christian Web Designer Case” Could Have Been Much Easier
If it had been treated properly as a “freedom of the press” case, then whether designing was for business or personal purposes would have been irrelevant.
Tyler v. Hennepin County: Why This Seemingly Innocent Decision is Disquieting
This case undermined state control over its own property law and probably gave the property owner an undeserved benefit.
Arizona v. Navajo Nation: SCOTUS Zags Back
A key part of the majority opinion seems to conflict with the majority opinion in an Indian law case decided just a few days earlier.
Supreme Court Confirms Rule that when State Legislatures Act in the Amendment Process, They Do So Independently
The Supreme Court has re-confirmed a key rule of constitutional amendment law.
Here’s Why It Seems Trump is Always in Trouble
The weaponization of institutions against conservative politicians is nothing new, but Trump, unlike others, has not learned how to counter it.
The Supreme Court’s Confused Decision in Haaland v. Brackeen
The Commerce Clause part of the decision is a mess. There is no more polite way to describe it.
Justice Thomas’s Latest Dissent: The Constitution and Federal Spending
Justice Clarence Thomas frequently uses concurring and dissenting opinions to explain the Constitution’s fundamental principles.
Another Case of “Government Failure:” Lefty Lakewood Ignores Anti-Noise Laws
“Progressive” priorities are not about solving real problems. Rather, they center on degrading well-run First World locales into Third World hell-holes.
SCOTUS Curbs EPA: The Sackett Case
Justice Alito’s majority opinion held that the phrase “waters of the United States” means only defined bodies of water—such as lakes and streams—and those wetlands that so border them that their waters’ surface merges with the surface of the lake or stream.
