May state legislative applications limit an Article V convention? Subject, yes; specific language, probably not
- September 12, 2013
reform
- Home
- reform
What’s in Store for Criminal Justice Reforms in 2011?0
- November 17, 2010
Amendment 63's Foes Only Want You for Your Body0
- October 27, 2010
by Brian Schwartz Should Colorado mandate that each car owner buy a comprehensive lifetime vehicle warranty? By the logic of a common argument against Colorado Amendment 63 and for mandatory medical insurance, the answer is “Yes.” Mandatory insurance treats your body as a means to political ends, rather than respecting your rights as an individual.
READ MOREColorado Amendment 63: Freedom Is Too "Haphazard" for Bell Policy Center0
- October 6, 2010
In a recent Denver Post op-ed, Bob Semro of the Bell Policy Center writes that Amendment 63 would “move Colorado to a less protected, more haphazard health care system where people pay directly for services rather than having health insurance.” What Bob Semro called “haphazard” is really personal freedom. The freedom to pay for medical
READ MORE
Amendment 63 Protects Right to Spend Money on Your Own Medical Care0
- October 1, 2010
by Linda Gorman, Ph.D. Passing Amendment 63 in November would ensure that you will have the right to use your own money to pay for the medical care that you think you need. If you live in Colorado you need this protection, and you need it now. Colorado’s health agencies plan to control your health
READ MOREAmendment 63 Protects Right to Spend Own Money on Medical Care0
- September 29, 2010
By Linda Gorman, PhD Passing Amendment 63 in November would ensure that you will have the right to use your own money to pay for the medical care that you think you need. If you live in Colorado you need this protection, and you need it now. Colorado’s health agencies plan to control your health
READ MOREOpposition to Amendment 63 Both Flawed and Deceptive0
- September 7, 2010
by Brian Schwartz Mandatory insurance takes what’s wrong with health insurance and makes it worse. It means higher costs, affordable insurance becomes illegal, and less incentive to please patients. Amendment 63 would block Colorado politicians from imposing mandatory insurance. It would also prevent the feds from pressuring the Colorado legislature to enforce Washington’s version of
READ MORE
