May state legislative applications limit an Article V convention? Subject, yes; specific language, probably not
- September 12, 2013
In an impeachment trial, if the House managers claim that the accused’s alleged lies form a basis for conviction, then they have the burden of proving—by clear and convincing evidence—that the statements were, in fact, lies.
READ MORETo ensure fairness, the prosecuting House managers must demonstrate decisively (1) that the election was fair, (2) that Trump had no reasonable grounds for believing otherwise, and (3) that he had a corrupt motive for lying.
READ MOREWhatever you may think of Trump’s speech, the evidence shows, and the prosecutors implicitly admit, he did not commit a crime. This creates some problems for the prosecution.
READ MOREYou can see how the evidence goes in both directions.
READ MORE2020 election irregularities: “For the survival of the republic, we cannot sweep such evidence under the rug.”
READ MORENow, if these characters don’t understand even the fundamentals of their jobs, how can we expect them to know enough to govern health care? Or education? Or the environment? Or defense, commerce, or any of the other activities they purport to regulate?
READ MORE