Quantcast
728 x 90
728 x 90
728 x 90
728 x 90
728 x 90



  • King v. Burwell: The Latest Obamacare Mess at the Supreme Court0

    • March 10, 2015

    When I first heard about King v. Burwell, the latest Obamacare controversy before the U.S. Supreme Court, I assumed it was the kind of case in which the legislative intent was clear, but for one reason or another the wording of the statute did not match the legislative intent. That would have been an interesting

    READ MORE
  • More Evidence From Last Term That It’s Not a “Conservative Supreme Court”0

    • October 20, 2014

    Note: This article was first published at cns news. There is a common media myth that the current U.S. Supreme Court, or at least a majority of the current justices, is “conservative.” But if a “conservative” justice is one who consistently interprets the Constitution in accordance with traditional methods of judging—as the Founders intended for

    READ MORE
  • Did Obamacare Violate the Constitution’s Origination Clause? No. . . and Yes0

    • August 5, 2014

    Note: This a modified version of an article that appeared at The American Thinker. Two years ago, the Supreme Court declared Obamacare’s penalty for failure to purchase conforming insurance to be a “tax.” Several plaintiffs subsequently sued in federal court arguing that the penalty is invalid for violating the Constitution’s Origination Clause. The Origination Clause

    READ MORE