May state legislative applications limit an Article V convention? Subject, yes; specific language, probably not
- September 12, 2013
Amendment 63
- Home
- Amendment 63
Amendment 63 protects your individual rights0
- October 19, 2010
A and virtually fact-free editorial in the Aurora Sentinel says Amendment 63 “has nothing to do with rights and everything to do with legislative wrongs.” Wrong. It has everything to with rights and preventing legislative wrongs.
READ MOREColorado Amendment 630
- October 16, 2010
[Scroll down for most recent blog posts.] Amendment text Commentary in support of Amendment 63 & refuting the opposition Latest blog posts about Amendment 63 How you can promote Amendment 63. Watch the Amendment 63 Campaign Commercial here if it does not appear below.
READ MOREColorado Amendment 63 vs. the “endless lawsuit” argument0
- October 14, 2010
A common argument against Amendment 63 is that it “will lead to endless lawsuits.” This is like opposing the First Amendment because of potential lawsuits from people seeking to use government to restrict your free speech.
READ MORE
Amendment 63: keeping you out of jail0
- October 12, 2010
Check out this new video on Colorado Amendment 63: See also this related post: Jail time for not having (legal) health insurance? and read the text of the Amendment. More health care videos.
READ MOREAmendment 63 vs. the elitist vision of the anointed0
- October 11, 2010
Two good letters to the editor in support of Colorado Amendment 63 – health care choice.
READ MOREAmendment 63: freedom is too “haphazard” for Bell Policy Center0
- October 11, 2010
Huffington Post: Bob Semro of the Bell Policy Center writes that Amendment 63 would “move Colorado to a less protected, more haphazard health care system where people pay directly for services rather than having health insurance.” In other words, he doesn’t like when people have the freedom to be paying customers.
READ MORE
