Quantcast
728 x 90
728 x 90
728 x 90
728 x 90
728 x 90



Energy and Environmental Policy (E2P) at the Independence Institute

By all measures, life is better. Because of our ability to safely, responsibly and efficiently develop natural resources, our standard of living is up, life expectancy is up, and our environment is cleaner. Individuals prosper while also enjoying a healthy planet. If we create an atmosphere where human potential flourishes and we dare to imagine, then everyone can reap the benefits of affordable, reliable, abundant, and safe power and revel in the beauty of a thriving environment.

Our Vision

Access to affordable, reliable, abundant, safe energy and a clean environment are not mutually exclusive. At E2P we envision a Colorado where every person is in control of his or her own energy and environmental destiny. Private property owners are in the best position to protect their land and environment, and the choice of energy resources and how they are utilized should come from the demands of an innovative and free market.

What is the role of government? To remain neutral, let markets work, let individuals innovate, limit regulations, and refrain from picking winners and losers.

Our Principles

  • People first
  • Celebrate prosperity
  • Innovation over regulation
  • Commonsense conservation
  • Primacy of private property rights
  • Results over rhetoric
  • Reject cynicism

 

Free Market Energy and Environmental Policy

  • Embraces our entrepreneurial spirit and optimism that we can have affordable power, responsible domestic energy development, and a clean environment.
  • Puts individuals in the driver’s seat and allows them to control their own energy future.
  • Lets the choice of energy resources come from the demands of the free market, and not from the preferences of policymakers, lobbyists, or special interest groups.
  • Champions private property rights.
  • Challenges the 80-year-old, monopoly utility model of electricity generation and distribution.
  • Puts states ahead of Washington, D.C.
  • Encourages limited and consistent regulations.
  • Rejects taxpayer funded subsidies.
  • Doesn’t pick winners and losers.
  • Welcomes transparency.

 

Latest Posts

  • Proposed Boulder Plastic Bag Ban: Authoritarian Environmentalism

    • January 18, 2010

    Background from Daily Camera: Shopping in Boulder could get greener if some local students have their way. Inspired in part by a ban that passed in San Francisco in 2007, New Vista High and University of Colorado students are drafting an ordinance that would prohibit businesses — such as grocery stores — from using petroleum-based

    READ MORE
  • FYI – Wast Tire Recycling Development Fee

    • July 10, 2009

    PDF of full Paper Scribd version of full Paper DEFINITIONS “Tire” means a tire sold by a retailer for any passenger vehicle. “Motor vehicle” Means any self-propelled vehicle designed primarily travel on the public highways which is generally used to transport persons and/or property over the public highways [§42-1-102(58), C.R.S.] This includes automobiles, minivans, all

    READ MORE
  • Why Colorado Should Not Build High-Speed Rail

    • June 23, 2009

    Why Colorado Should Not Build High-Speed Rail

    READ MORE
  • Corn Ethanol: Right Problem, Poor Solution

    • June 10, 2008

    IP-5-2008 (June 2008) Author: Gary A. Young PDF of full Issue Paper Scribd version of full Issue Paper Executive Summary The corporate welfare program for corn ethanol is inefficient and environmentally harmful. Energy independence is a genuine problem, but subsidizing corn ethanol is a bad solution: • Burning corn ethanol instead of gasoline releases 1.7

    READ MORE
  • James M. Taylor The Heartland Institute Speech

    • February 22, 2008

    Environment Policy Speech (February 2010) Author: James M. Taylor PDF of full Paper Scribd version of full Paper Thanks you very much for the kind introduction and for the opportunity to speak here today. Thanks you, also, Dr. Gray and Dr. Hayden, for the very informative presentations on climate science. What I would like to

    READ MORE
  • The Faulty Economics of Colorado's Climate Change Action Plan:A Peer Review by Benjamin Powell

    • February 12, 2008

    With alarming rhetoric, Governor Bill Ritter unveiled his Climate Change Action Plan, an ambitious 32-page call to action outlining his goals and strategies for reducing “harmful greenhouse gas emissions,” much of which would be enacted via executive order.
    Governor Ritter’s plan comes from the collaborative work of the Rocky Mountain Climate Organization and the Center for Climate Strategies (CCS), a Pennsylvania-based nonprofit mostly funded
    by left-leaning environmental grant makers like the Rockefeller Brothers Fund. They formed the Colorado Climate Project and established the Climate Action Panel (CAP) “to develop recommendations for actions that can be taken in Colorado by the state government, local governments, water providers, the private sector, and individuals to reduce the state’s contribution and vulnerability to a changed climate.” (Appendix A, P.1, www.coloradoclimate.org) Colorado financial contributors include Pat Stryker and Denver Water.

    READ MORE