May state legislative applications limit an Article V convention? Subject, yes; specific language, probably not
- September 12, 2013
It is perverse to spend so much [constitutional law] class time on areas of recurrently-shifting jurisprudence, while neglecting constitutional principles that are just as central and far more enduring.
READ MORE“The Hill” offers the latest example of outrageous pro-establishment media bias—publishing false information about the citizens’ constitutional amendment process, and then refusing either a correction or a response.
READ MOREThe baseless argument that a “national convention can do anything” never has had any force with the national convention known as the Electoral College.
READ MOREThe lamp of experience sheds light unmistakably bright and clear: Constitutional amendments work.
READ MOREWe have everything to gain from a convention of states and nothing to lose. . . We have a moral and legal obligation to employ that constitutional tool before splitting up the country.
READ MOREThese objections are not real. They are excuses made by lazy and cowardly people avoiding their civic responsibility.
READ MORE