Rob Natelson reviews the recent Supreme Court term with Jon Caldara
Rob Natelson reviews the recent Supreme Court term with Jon Caldara at this link.
“Ask Rob Natelson” to Air Monthly on KLZ-560 Denver Radio
The segment will air again on August 14, and after that on the second Tuesday of each month.
Unpacking the Supreme Court’s ‘Universal Injunction’ Decision
The court found that the statute granting courts power to grant injunctions did not include universal injunctions.
Understanding the Supreme Court’s Case on Transgender Treatment for Children
Skrmetti was one of several cases this year in which the court’s decision protected children.
Implied Powers in the Constitution
The Founding-era doctrine of implied powers has been misunderstood during the modern era. Result have been an over-estimate of congressional power and confusion about the President’s authority.
Review: Homo-eroticism and Other Problems in Central City’s “Barber of Seville”
Don’t take your kids to this production of the Barber of Seville.
The Sandbagging of Joe Biden – Part II
New evidence supports Rob’s theory that people around Joe Biden agreed to his debate with Donald Trump as a way of clearing the field for another Democratic nominee.
How the Supreme Court Went Wrong in the ‘Ghost Gun’ Case
It appears the court was trying to update the statute. But updating federal statutes is not the job of appointed-for-life judges. It is a job for democratically-elected members of Congress.
The False Media Claim about the Supreme Court
The media’s narrative of a “6-3 conservative majority” is obviously defective. But it does serve a purpose . . . .
Justice Clarence Thomas’s Wise Words About ‘Experts’
Experts and professional associations always have been influenced by economic considerations. Today, few are immune from political pressure as well.
“The Original Constitution”—Long-Awaited 4th Edition Arrives!
The latest edition responds to new controversies surrounding an old document.
The Supreme Court’s Unanimous Religious Freedom Ruling Explained
The media claim that there is a firm 6-3 Supreme Court is untrue, as demonstrated by this freedom of religion case.
