A new Supreme Court case on establishment of religion
By the time ratification was complete, the Constitution’s implications for religion were understood: Religious faith was valuable for good government. But government was to treat individual religions equally, as long as they conducted themselves in an orderly manner.
Why the Left wants to destroy the Boy Scouts
Among all Scouting’s values, from the Left’s point of view the worst may be self-reliance.
How the Founders told us the Constitution would restrict federal power
This new article presents even more evidence on how the federal government was supposed to be limited.
John Paul Stevens’ greatest legacy
By clarifying constitutional amendment law, Stevens made it more accessible to citizens who now seek to use it to cure our dysfunctional federal government.
How the Left dominates states through “National Popular Vote”
NPV enables Democrats and Left-leaning activists to control a state merely by running up vote totals in a few counties or regions.
Here are 206 wicked corporations to boycott
Will their next brief urge the court to dispense with republican government and declare a monarchy?
Two liberal Supreme Court justices slap down the Left’s historical desecration
Two of the Supreme Court’s most liberal members effectively told us they want no part of this campaign of historical destruction.
Amending the U.S. Constitution: a basic guide
Historically, amendments have proven to be powerful vehicles for reform.
The verdict is in: We do not have a “conservative Supreme Court”
The Supreme Court term just over certainly confirmed what I wrote shortly after it started: The constant refrain that the current bench is a “conservative Supreme Court” with a “conservative majority” is flat wrong.
New SCOTUS case does more than pave the way to reverse Roe v. Wade
Justice Clarence Thomas’s concurrence probably received the most media attention. It is an essay on when the Supreme Court should follow precedent or overrule it. It helps lay the basis for reversing Roe v. Wade . . . .
Curb on the regulatory state? Court holds corporations protected from “excessive fines”
Colorado Supreme Court ruled that the Excessive Fines Clause does protect corporations.
How our presidential election system works
Some writers claim the framers adopted an indirect election procedure because they didn’t trust democracy. This is an oversimplification. The framers balanced many factors.
