Trump v. Twitter, Part 2: Can a private company violate the First Amendment?
So, the theory goes, if Congress invited Twitter to exercise political censorship, then Congress violated the First Amendment. But this theory also has weaknesses . . . .
Trump v. Twitter, Part 1: How social media censors abuse federal law
Social media’s power to censor must be exercised only to empower parents in protecting their children. . . . . It’s not a license for a company’s civic ignoramuses to impose their political prejudices on the rest of us.
How the media misrepresent our liberal-leaning Supreme Court
The cases show that the Roberts court is committed to the case precedents through which the liberal 20th century justices re-wrote the Constitution.
The liberal Supreme Court: A review of the recent term
The court doesn’t have a “conservative majority.” In constitutional cases at least, it leans toward the liberal side.
Defending the Constitution: Secrets behind those ‘obscure’ provisions
Here are questions and answers addressing five of the Constitution’s less famous provisions.
Supreme Court: property rights vs. labor unions
This is a rare case in which the liberal media’s imaginary “conservative Supreme Court majority” really showed up.
The other problem with Critical Race “Theory”
The traditional school curriculum is traditional for a reason: It has stood the test of time. School resources are too precious to divert elsewhere.
The Supreme Court’s wretched Obamacare decision
Can there any clearer demonstration of why we need a convention of the states to take back our government?
Southern slaveholders: the inventors of ‘cancel culture’
“[P]arallels between the cancel culture of the slaveholders and that of modern “progressives” are not accidental at all.”
The “woke” media smears of Sidney Powell
“I have never met Powell and have no particular attitude toward her, positive or negative. But professional journalists should treat everyone fairly.”
Biden and Harris flout constitutional immigration duties
Controlling the border is a constitutional mandate, not an option
Defending the Constitution: The founders’ words were not ‘meaningless’ or ‘vague’
The charge that the Constitution is “vague” is based on ignorance.
