Another Colorado Attack on the First Amendment Goes to the Supreme Court
Since taking control of the state a decade ago, “progressive” leftists have repeatedly disgraced Colorado by trampling the First Amendment.
New Article on Federal Misuse of State National Guards
When states need their guardsmen, they often find that that they are unavailable because the feds have deployed them overseas—in clear violation of the Constitution.
Flowers Foods v. Brock: Does It Signal a Future Curb in Congress’s Overuse of Its Commerce Power?
It is possible—just possible—that SCOTUS took this easy case as a precursor to narrowing Congress’s economic powers?
The Tariff Case—A Lost Opportunity (exclusive analysis for II)
Learning Resources v. Trump was a lost opportunity to begin the process of nudging Congress back into its constitutional cage.
Justice Thomas gives Rob his 41st SCOTUS citation–one of the nation’s highest tallies
Supreme Court justices have relied on Rob’s research 41 times since 2013, one of the highest numbers of any legal scholar.
Overturning the Twentieth Century?
Elite opinion aside, the Supreme Court has not aggressively attacked the bad precedents of the past century. Maybe it should.
The Independence Institute’s Rob Natelson Garners 40th Supreme Court Citation
Supreme Court justices have cited Rob Natelson’s research articles by name 40 times.
Inflation: The Role of a Mistaken Supreme Court
Two erroneous Supreme Court decisions permanently weakened the stability of the dollar.
Unpacking the Presidential Appointments Lawsuit
For the Supreme Court to decide in favor of the president, it probably would have to overrule Humphrey’s Executor v. United States (1935)
Unpacking the Supreme Court’s ‘Universal Injunction’ Decision
The court found that the statute granting courts power to grant injunctions did not include universal injunctions.
Understanding the Supreme Court’s Case on Transgender Treatment for Children
Skrmetti was one of several cases this year in which the court’s decision protected children.
The False Media Claim about the Supreme Court
The media’s narrative of a “6-3 conservative majority” is obviously defective. But it does serve a purpose . . . .
