May state legislative applications limit an Article V convention? Subject, yes; specific language, probably not
- September 12, 2013
The New York Times asks: “What would the future hold if the Supreme Court strikes down the most controversial part of the health care law, the individual mandate?” The Times published responses from two free-market health care advocates: Michael Cannon (Cato) & Grace-Marie Turner (Galen). Continue reading
READ MOREConsumer-directed health plans — not federal government dictates — have helped bring down costs. Obamacare should be expanding them — not regulating them out of existence. Continue reading
READ MOREWhile the Supreme Court’s decision is likely a month away … Congress, state governments, and businesses across the country are puzzling over “what if” alternatives to try to be ready when the decision is issued. Here are the three most likely options: Continue reading
READ MOREWhile the Supreme Court’s decision is likely a month away … Congress, state governments, and businesses across the country are puzzling over “what if” alternatives to try to be ready when the decision is issued. Here are the three most likely options: Continue reading
READ MOREThe Obama administration can’t fix the actual substance of [its] health plan. Hence, their strategy is to obfuscate its problems with deceptive language and hope that voters don’t catch on. Continue reading
READ MOREInsurance agents offer many people a valuable service of finding the best price on a the individual insurance plan that best fits their needs. But ObamaCare’s medical loss ratio requirements threaten to drive agents out of business. Continue reading
READ MORE