May state legislative applications limit an Article V convention? Subject, yes; specific language, probably not
- September 12, 2013
[T]he search for a single “non-delegation” principle applicable to all congressional powers is a futile one. Instead, the scope of permissible delegation of any particular congressional power must be sought in the meaning of the words describing that power.
READ MORE[S]etting minimum consumption ages is not a power the Constitution grants the federal government. The Constitution reserves it to the states.
READ MOREImpeachment law is not for amateurs. It rests on English parliamentary history extending at least as far back as the 1300s. . . .
READ MOREThese witnesses and their congressional sponsors apparently believe the consensus of professionals should control foreign policy. . . . But the Constitution squarely repudiates this “foreign policy by committee” approach.
READ MORENothing in the Constitution gives [the Speaker of the House a presidential-style veto.
READ MORE[A] whole generation of law students has been trained to think that the 19th century courts were heartless tools of malicious capitalists, and that enlightened reform came only with the virtuous 20th century “progressives.”
READ MORE