H.R. 1 would create chaos only a constitutional amendment could fix

H.R. 1 contains some sections that are perfectly constitutional . . . .But they are intertwined with provisions that are clearly (or arguably) unconstitutional. This intertwining would take decades of litigation to unravel.
How a ‘Convention of States’ really works

Frantic claims that it’s a “constitutional convention” … or that it can issue a new document or “radically re-write” the existing one … or change the ratification procedure—none of these have any legal or historical basis.
When Can an Originalist Scholar Begin with the Constitution’s Text?

Sometimes after examining the text it even remains unclear whether that text is unclear! What seems obvious on initial examination may be entirely wrong.
Can Trump be disqualified from the presidency?

Congress cannot disqualify Trump from serving as president again.
Originalism: the constitutionality of impeaching ex-presidents

The Constitution’s language creates an evidentiary presumption against late impeachment . . . but it might be rebutted.
The impeachment videos: Raskin’s questionable tactics

The doctored anti-Trump videos did not meet any reasonable standard of admissibility.
Prosecutors tried to make opinions impeachable

In an impeachment trial, if the House managers claim that the accused’s alleged lies form a basis for conviction, then they have the burden of proving—by clear and convincing evidence—that the statements were, in fact, lies.
The unfair procedures in the Trump impeachment

To ensure fairness, the prosecuting House managers must demonstrate decisively (1) that the election was fair, (2) that Trump had no reasonable grounds for believing otherwise, and (3) that he had a corrupt motive for lying.
What you need to know about the lawyers’ arguments on impeachment

Whatever you may think of Trump’s speech, the evidence shows, and the prosecutors implicitly admit, he did not commit a crime. This creates some problems for the prosecution.
Does the Constitution allow impeachment of an ex-President?

You can see how the evidence goes in both directions.
Saving America and election integrity: 3rd in a series

2020 election irregularities: “For the survival of the republic, we cannot sweep such evidence under the rug.”
Saving America and election Integrity: 2nd in a series

Now, if these characters don’t understand even the fundamentals of their jobs, how can we expect them to know enough to govern health care? Or education? Or the environment? Or defense, commerce, or any of the other activities they purport to regulate?