May state legislative applications limit an Article V convention? Subject, yes; specific language, probably not
- September 12, 2013
For the court to strike down a federal abortion law, it would have to . . . courageously enforce the Constitution’s subject-matter boundaries between federal and state jurisdiction.
READ MOREThe leading myth in Indian law is that the Constitution gives Congress “plenary” (absolute) authority over Indian affairs.
READ MOREOne reason the votes in these cases were so close is that the law of tribal sovereignty is chaotic.
READ MOREMass shootings tend to happen in so-called “gun free zones” where law-abiding people are disarmed. . . . [Yet] all the justices on the court voted for this misguided decision.
READ MOREThe court’s decisions upholding state vax mandates gave us a hint that it was about to overturn Roe.
READ MOREFor the pure political operative, the truth of a statement or its value as public policy is entirely irrelevant. For the pure political operative, issues are just weapons.
READ MORE