The 1768 Massachusetts Circular Letter: A Forerunner to the Constitution

This letter anticipated important aspects of the Constitution, written two decades later.
More Problems with Open & Semi-Closed Primaries

Democracy works best when voters are offered contrasting policy options. The traditional closed primary system gives the voters better general election choices.
New Study: Why Montana Needs a New Constitution

Among the current constitution’s problems are ambiguous and contradictory wording and the fact that the voters likely never ratified it.
Another Colorado Attack on the First Amendment Goes to the Supreme Court

Since taking control of the state a decade ago, “progressive” leftists have repeatedly disgraced Colorado by trampling the First Amendment.
New Article on Federal Misuse of State National Guards

When states need their guardsmen, they often find that that they are unavailable because the feds have deployed them overseas—in clear violation of the Constitution.
The impact of three U.S. Supreme Court rulings on free enterprise

Accurate interpretation of the Constitution often promotes free markets.
Abolish the CDC and NIH

All of these are easily accessible examples of CDC and NIH politicization. . . . Only whistleblowers can reveal the full extent of the rot within.
Birthright Blunders

The Supreme Court made mistakes, but the Trump administration also was at fault for adopting the wrong strategy.
“Virgil and the Constitution” is Now Published!

Virgil was by far the most popular poet among those who debated the Constitution.
What Is the Declaration of Independence?

During the 18th century, an official declaration was an announcement of a particular event, often after the event had occurred.
America’s Worst Appeals Court

After many years of judicial abuses, Montanans are finally conducting extensive discussions on court reform.
Chiles v. Salazar: SCOTUS Voids Another Colorado Attack on the First Amendment

In the Chiles case, Colorado officials claimed their enactment was a health measure. The justices likely recognized that this may have been a pretext.