The Supreme Court’s Trademark Case and the First Amendment: Carrying History Too Far
- June 30, 2024
The statute is based on an overly-expansive definition of congressional power . . . But no member of the court wrote a concurring opinion to point that out . . .
READ MOREThe more traditional justices differ significantly in their legal methods and often reach liberal results.
READ MOREThis article first appeared in Townhall.com. When Senator Susan Collins made her now-famous speech stating she would vote to approve the nomination of Brett Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court, a keystone of her argument amounted to, “He won’t change much.” She noted Judge Kavanaugh’s dedication to case precedent. She also noted that while the national
READ MORE. . . Those who adopted the Constitution understood that governance of recreational activities, such as sports, was reserved to the states. Regulation of in-state gambling, like other moral issues, similarly was outside the federal sphere.
READ MORE“Living Constitutionalists” sometimes claim erroneously that recovering the Constitution’s original meaning is impractical.
READ MOREJudicial protection from most economic regulations — even grossly unfair and anti-competitive ones — is so weak as to be nearly non-existent.
READ MORE