A Further Response to Prof. Ablavsky on the Indian Commerce Clause

We discovered that Ablavsky’s work contained a disturbing number of inaccurate, non-existent, and misleading citations, as well as deceptively-edited quotations.
One reason judges make mistakes about the Constitution

Sometimes judges must rely on biased, untrained people for information on how to interpret our Constitution.
Governor DeSantis, the raid on Trump, and the rule of law—Part II

DeSantis has just helped educate us on the rule of law. For that he deserves our gratitude.
Governor DeSantis and the Rule of Law—Part I

America’s success is due partly to our traditional respect for the rule of law.
Understanding the Constitution: Why it doesn’t protect the unborn

As Justice Samuel Alito pointed out in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health (pdf)—and as the late, great Justice Antonin Scalia said repeatedly—the Fifth and 14th Amendment Due Process Clauses really have nothing to do with abortion.
Understanding the Constitution: The Great Forgetting

All of these false assertions emerged from a historical process—primarily during the 19th century—that I’ve labeled “The Great Forgetting.”
Would a federal Law legalizing abortion survive the Supreme Court?

For the court to strike down a federal abortion law, it would have to . . . courageously enforce the Constitution’s subject-matter boundaries between federal and state jurisdiction.
The Constitution’s rules for relations with Indian tribes: part II

The leading myth in Indian law is that the Constitution gives Congress “plenary” (absolute) authority over Indian affairs.
The Supreme Court’s recent—and sweeping—Indian Law cases: part I

One reason the votes in these cases were so close is that the law of tribal sovereignty is chaotic.
The Montana Supreme Court’s Anti-Firearms Decision was Wrong

Mass shootings tend to happen in so-called “gun free zones” where law-abiding people are disarmed. . . . [Yet] all the justices on the court voted for this misguided decision.
The new Supreme Court: not conservative, but no longer liberal

The court’s decisions upholding state vax mandates gave us a hint that it was about to overturn Roe.
Why overturning Roe v. Wade causes so much rage

For the pure political operative, the truth of a statement or its value as public policy is entirely irrelevant. For the pure political operative, issues are just weapons.