Colorado health care choice

Amendment 63 vs. the Unlicensed Vampire Alarmists 0
- October 20, 2010
Huffington Post: Does the Colorado Constitution guarantee the rights of violent criminals to be armed in prison or when released on parole? You might think so if you believe criticisms of Amendment 63. Amendment 63 would prohibit the state from forcing you to buy a politician-approved health plan and protect your right to pay for medical care […]
READ MORE
Amendment 63 protects your individual rights 0
- October 19, 2010
A and virtually fact-free editorial in the Aurora Sentinel says Amendment 63 “has nothing to do with rights and everything to do with legislative wrongs.” Wrong. It has everything to with rights and preventing legislative wrongs.
READ MORE
Colorado Amendment 63 vs. the “endless lawsuit” argument 0
- October 14, 2010
A common argument against Amendment 63 is that it “will lead to endless lawsuits.” This is like opposing the First Amendment because of potential lawsuits from people seeking to use government to restrict your free speech.
READ MORE

Amendment 63: keeping you out of jail 0
- October 12, 2010
Check out this new video on Colorado Amendment 63: See also this related post: Jail time for not having (legal) health insurance? and read the text of the Amendment. More health care videos.
READ MORE
Amendment 63 vs. the elitist vision of the anointed 0
- October 11, 2010
Two good letters to the editor in support of Colorado Amendment 63 – health care choice.
READ MORE
Amendment 63: freedom is too “haphazard” for Bell Policy Center 0
- October 11, 2010
Huffington Post: Bob Semro of the Bell Policy Center writes that Amendment 63 would “move Colorado to a less protected, more haphazard health care system where people pay directly for services rather than having health insurance.” In other words, he doesn’t like when people have the freedom to be paying customers.
READ MORE

Contribute