Quantcast
728 x 90
728 x 90
728 x 90
728 x 90
728 x 90



  • Amendment 63: Denver Post vs. liberty & the U.S. Constitution0

    • October 8, 2010

    Rob Natelson, a Senior Fellow in Constitutional Jurisprudence at the Independence Institute, writes: The legal whizzes on the editorial board of the Denver Post have spoken: Amendment 63, the Right to Health Care Choice Initiative, is bad because Obama Care is constitutional. Today’s editorial reads: [W]e believe [Obama Care] will survive legal challenges and will […]

    READ MORE
  • Colorado Amendment 63: refuting the “cost-shift” & other flawed opposition0

    • October 6, 2010

    Boulder Daily Camera: Health care needs real reform, but mandatory insurance does the opposite by entrenching the worst of current policies. It bans affordable insurance, increases costs, and further extends insurers’ government-granted privileges at patients’ expense.

    READ MORE
  • Amendment 63 protects right to spend money on your own medical care0

    • October 4, 2010

    Writes Linda Gorman in the Salida Mountain Mail: Passing Amendment 63 in November would ensure that you will have the right to use your own money to pay for the medical care that you think you need. If you live in Colorado you need this protection, and you need it now. Colorado’s health agencies plan […]

    READ MORE